VWCE is a whole-world fund. SXR8 is the S&P 500. The question is not whether they overlap — obviously they do — but what the second one changes.
Adding the second fund takes NVDA from 4.48% of the portfolio to 5.40% — up. Every other name in it moves the same way.
| Holding | Money | Risk | Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| VWCE.DE | 70% | 69% | 0.99 |
| SXR8.DE | 30% | 31% | 1.03 |
Adding the second fund moves NVDA from 4.48% of the portfolio to 5.40% — up. The rest of the table moves the same way.
| Company | You hold | VWCE on its own |
|---|---|---|
| NVDA | 5.40% | 4.48% |
| AAPL | 5.10% | 4.27% |
| GOOGL | 4.28% | 3.61% |
| MSFT | 3.91% | 3.30% |
| AMZN | 3.00% | 2.52% |
| AVGO | 2.07% | 1.73% |
Both funds publish only their largest holdings, so this covers 28% of the money. The names below that line are held too; they are simply not published.
PORTFOLIO: VWCE + SXR8 2019-07-29 to 2026-09-07 · 1,806 trading days · USD 2 holdings, but the risk sits in about 1.0 independent directions. Essentially all of it is one shared direction, led by SXR8.DE, VWCE.DE. VWCE.DE carries 69% of the risk on its own. Volatility 18% · worst fall on record 34%. Risk 18% → 13% over the last year, mostly because the holdings themselves got quieter. Descriptive. No forecast, no advice. Every figure above is measured over the window named at the top. riskcopilot.app
Same engine, same window rules, nothing saved on our side.
Open the appMeasured 2019-07-29 to 2026-09-07 over 1,806 trading days, in USD, from yahoo prices. Descriptive: this page reports what these holdings have done and how their risk is built. It does not forecast returns or losses and it is not advice. This project has tested and abandoned 27 predictive hypotheses.